| October 17th 2001 at MANDEC (Manchester Dental
Education Centre), Higher Cambridge Street at 2pm
Joint meeting Manchester
University's Biostats Group on "Drug trials and
development"
Sheila Bird (MRC
Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health,
Cambridge)
Trials and Tribulations:
judicial, ethical and NICE
This talk will range over
issues such as (consumer principle of) randomization,
confidentiality versus criminality, informed consent,
informative drop-out, database linkage, non-randomized natural
history comparison of effectiveness, epidemiology and design of
effectiveness trials (pharmaceutical or judicial), costs, and
public health risk assessment.
Stephen Evans (UK Medicines
Control Agency)
Statistical contributions to
assessing safety of medicines
Statistical effort in the
development of medicines has tended to be concentrated on
assessing efficacy. When a new medicine is licensed its safety
is always provisional. The major statistical issues relate
to:
combining evidence from randomised trials;
statistics of rare events;
statistical issues in the interpretation of observational
studies.
These topics
will be illustrated by reference to hormones and venous
thromboembolism and cancer.
Stephen Senn (University
College, London)
The identifiability problem:
gene by treatment interaction, pharmacogenomics and cross-over
trials
It has been claimed that the
human genome project will make clinical trials "cleaner" by
permitting identification and selection or elimination
(as the case may be) of responders and non-responders for
treatment. This would then lead to so-called
"theranostic" treatment strategies in which genetic diagnosis
and gene-tailored treatment are equal partners. I give some
grounds for suggesting that this may be more difficult than has
been supposed. I also suggest that the generally despised
(by biostatisticians) cross-over trial may have a role to play
in some would-be theranostic strategies.
Stephen Evans' Presentation (this is a
personal view)
Stephen Senn's
Presentation
|